Which one is best will largely depend on your own specific needs and priorities. They are both very small and portable with similar body sizes, though the Z50 is a bit lighter. Both limit your image stabilization to either optical in-lens or electronic stabilization only in video mode.
Full frame sensors offer some specific benefits, particularly if you want to get the most background blur possible, but there can also be some benefits to APS-C smaller overall camera, the crop factor gives you more perceived reach — handy for telephoto shooters. Generally, full frame has better low light performance than crop frame sensors, but Nikon generally is superior to Canon in that regard.
Between these two cameras, those two factors end up splitting the difference and low light performance is very comparable. Image quality is reported to be slightly better with the Canon RP. Both cameras have a lot of compelling features for entry-level shooters.
If not, perhaps the best deciding factor would be if you wanted the higher resolution and full frame sensor of the RP or the faster burst shooting of the Z All three models are full frame mirrorless cameras with relatively-to-very-high resolution sensors There are a couple different price points being targeted, making for some inexact comparisons. The EOS R is, for all practical purposes, a mirrorless version of the 5D Mark IV, making it essentially a four year old camera albeit with a new, larger mount system while the Zs are both completely new.
Looking at image quality, the Z7 will have the potential for the sharpest shots due to the absence of a low-pass filter. While the EOS R has very capable low light performance, Nikon still delivers even better dynamic range. The other area where the Nikons will have a significant benefit over the Canon is image stabilization.
There are two areas where Canon steps forward, though. The second is video. And if 4K video is an absolute must, only the Z6 out of these three cameras offers uncropped 4K video.
Between these three cameras, if you need the best photo performance you can get right now whatever the cost, the Z7 is probably the choice for you, but both the Z6 and EOS R are strong competitors. The takeaway was that the D was a little better for low light conditions while the T7i was a better option for high action shots thanks to a faster burst rate. Since then, Canon has released a new version, the T8i and the results are…pretty much the same. The upgrades made from the T7i to T8i are largely incremental, with no remarkable improvements.
Bottom line is that both cameras are good options for entry-level DSLRs, with the capability of getting good pictures, especially if paired with nice lenses, but that neither really stands out from the other in terms of being a clear winner.
This year we needed to mix it up a little bit. The conclusion before was that, while the Canons were the better choices if you wanted to shoot video, the D was clearly better for still photography. So how does the 90D compare now? The 90D brings a number of noticeable improvements over the previously-discussed models. Resolution has been significantly improved, up to With the current matchup, the question changes from still or video to low light or not.
If you often shoot in challenging lighting, the Nikon is still probably the better choice, but the other improvements of the 90D make it extremely compelling. For a more hands-on approach, many photographers and videographers opt to rent a DSLR before buying to help make the right choice.
On paper, the 6D Mark II is not an exciting camera. It has good specs across the board, but nothing that jumps out as being truly extraordinary. It has a higher resolution than the D, but both are going to be enough for most people. It has a decent — but not great — frames per second shooting speed.
Generally speaking, full frame sensors offer a host of benefits over APS-C, such as improved low light performance and image quality. With both of these models being targeted towards professionals, they are both extremely capable cameras.
The D also offers significantly higher resolution The 5D Mark IV is somewhat smaller and lighter, which can make it more comfortable to use in a variety of situations. Both Canon and Nikon have introduced new flagship cameras this year, but like years past the reality is the choice between flagships typically comes down to factors aside from the actual camera. Both have extensive weather proofing, robust build quality, extremely durable shutters, and fast shooting. Both cameras have native ISOs of ,, but Nikon offers boosted ISO all the way to 3,,, giving it the edge in extremely dark conditions.
In the mid-range segment, both Nikon and Canon have an overwhelming amount of camera models to choose from. So much so, that most of it will come down to personal preference. In this segment, both brands offer enough features to tip the scale on either side. Things are a little different when it comes to the ultra-high-end range of cameras. For every Nikon offering, there is a Canon offering that matches it. But Canon still pulls ahead of Nikon when it comes to video capabilities.
Most other features can be considered on par with the other brand. Overall, Nikon offers a better bang for your buck in both its entry and mid-range cameras, only fumbling in the high-end range. Nikon is the clear winner here when it comes to product range. When talking about lenses, Canon has always been marginally ahead of the game. Both Nikon and Canon offer a wide variety of lenses at all price points.
However, Canon's foray into lenses was with premium ultra-expensive lenses, whereas Nikon initially had budget offerings. Nowadays, Nikon lenses tend to be slightly more expensive in their respective segments. Both Nikon and Canon have options for all popular focal lengths.
Both brands also make lenses that cater to very specific needs. It's best to be aware of the different types of camera lenses and their usage scenarios to choose what's right for you. When it comes to innovation, Canon simply doesn't have any match. In the lens category, Canon has always been ahead of any other brand, with Nikon mostly playing catch-up.
Since both brands compete so closely against each other, it is unlikely you will find any major difference between the photographs shot by Nikon or Canon cameras. In fact, the ISO on Nikon's flagship camera, the Nikon D6, can be dialed all the way up to 3,,, resulting in better performance in dark conditions. All in all, if you're someone who shoots at night, Nikon will offer you better quality images.
Mid-level DSLRs have two digit numerals in the name. The Dseries is the most basic, followed by the D series for beginners and users on a budget, and the D series for enthusiasts and more advanced users. For mirrorless, Nikon has the Z 6 and Z 7 in the full-frame line-up, with the Z 7 being the more advanced of the two. Nikon also recently added crop sensor mirrorless cameras with the Nikon Z Full-frame lenses work on the Z 50, making it easy to upgrade to a full-frame camera down the road.
The Z DX lenses will also work on full-frame Z cameras, albeit in a cropped mode. Nikon used to make an even smaller mirrorless line, the 1 series, but it has been discontinued.
Canon has an entire line of APS-C mirrorless cameras while Nikon only has two full-frame models and a single crop sensor. Can you tell which of the above images were shot on a Nikon, and which were taken with a Canon?
Professional photographers have been shooting both brands for decades and producing great results from each. Some photographers may prefer the straight-from-the-camera colors from one brand over the other, but there is little that truly separates them, especially once those photos have been edited.
Nikons tend to rate higher for dynamic range, for example. What matters more is the effort you put in to creating a good photograph. A few years ago, Canon was well out in front when it came to video. Now, that lead has disappeared — and in the case of mirrorless, Nikon has clearly sprinted to the front. Both Canons and Nikons will shoot some good video, but as Nikon has no competing cinema camera line, it is free to incorporate higher-end video features into its still cameras.
The Nikons have higher-quality video output over HDMI, as well, great for pros who want to record video using an external recorder. Holding a Canon feels different than holding a Nikon, and ergonomics are a surprisingly important part of the photography equation.
Again, this is something that comes down to personal preference. The grips each have their own distinct designs, and the placement of the command dials and buttons is quite different.
The mode dials also look a little different.
0コメント